Topic: [SOLVED] Outlook (365) says '522 Mail with no Date header not accepted''

[guest22]

Hi,


as per subject, a friend of mine has added his sme server account to his outlook (365?) but get's this error.


Anybody any clue? Full headers available on request privately.


TIA!

[Stefano]

are we talking about the test message sent during account verification?

if so, it's a well known Outlook bug since... well, since Outlook exists (see https://wiki.contribs.org/Email#Outlook_test_message_doesn.27t_come_through)

you can disable the header's check (see the same page, some rows below)

otherwise, give us some more details, thank you

[guest22]

are we talking about the test message sent during account verification?

Yes!

if so, it's a well known Outlook bug since... well, since Outlook exists (see https://wiki.contribs.org/Email#Outlook_test_message_doesn.27t_come_through)
you can disable the header's check (see the same page, some rows below)

No chance!

Thanks !

[Stefano]

ok.. may I guess you don't want to do so?

you can do it just to validate the email account and then re-enable

[Daniel B.]

This shouldn't be needed anymore with sme 9.2 as the date header is now disabled by default

[Stefano]

well, I guess he can't wait SME 9.2 too
 

[guest22]

This shouldn't be needed anymore with sme 9.2 as the date header is now disabled by default

But the 'error message' was about 'without Date header'..?

[Stefano]

yes.. outlook sends a message with no "date" header in its test

in SME9.2, with the new qpsmtpd, many things are changed (see https://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9773)

[guest22]

yes.. outlook sends a message with no "date" header in its test

in SME9.2, with the new qpsmtpd, many things are changed (see https://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9773)

Al clear, thanks!

[TerryF]

Hey HF, see that bug for comment 34 re restart of qpsmtpd,

I know I am telling you the obvious, BUT, you never know

[guest22]

Hey HF, see that bug for comment 34 re restart of qpsmtpd,

I know I am telling you the obvious, BUT, you never know

Thanks for the pointer Terry!