Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

latest SAMBA YUM UPDATES gives NT_STATUS_TRUSTED_RELATIONSHIP_FAILURE

Offline Daniel B.

  • *
  • 1,699
  • +0/-0
    • Firewall Services, la sécurité des réseaux
No, still not solved. You can update if you don't need domain functionnality. Or you can update everything but samba packages with:

Code: [Select]
yum update --exclude=samba\*,libtalloc,libtdb,libtevent,tdb-tools
C'est la fin du monde !!! :lol:

Offline fpausp

  • *
  • 728
  • +0/-0
Thank you Daniel.

Regards
Viribus unitis

Offline brianr

  • *
  • 988
  • +2/-0
I don't think so, this is the latest on the upstream bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326918#c24
Brian j Read
(retired, for a second time, still got 2 installations though)
The instrument I am playing is my favourite Melodeon.
.........

Offline Brave Dave

  • *
  • 185
  • +0/-0
thanks to this post and all who have posted here

fixed problem for me :-)
.:DB:.

Offline stabilys

  • *
  • 76
  • +0/-0
  • Ah din't do it!!
    • Stabilys Ltd
Just to say we have the same problem on SME 8.1 and 9.1 and with Windows 7, 8.1 and 10 on 78 domain member workstations at two sites so far :(

I'm not happy about running insecure versions, but if that's what it takes...

Should I add to the report upstream or is that redundant?

Ta.
This, too, will pass ;)

guest22

Just to say we have the same problem on SME 8.1 and 9.1....


You should update your SME Server 8.1 to SME Server 8.2

Offline stabilys

  • *
  • 76
  • +0/-0
  • Ah din't do it!!
    • Stabilys Ltd
Apologies, a mistyping: SME 8.*2* and 9.1
This, too, will pass ;)

Offline fpausp

  • *
  • 728
  • +0/-0
Looks OK (SME9) since the update today, can anybody confirm ?
Viribus unitis

Offline brianr

  • *
  • 988
  • +2/-0
Looks OK (SME9) since the update today, can anybody confirm ?

I doubt it - the fix has not been released upstream as far as I can tell.

I've updated my servers using the update command from above which excludes the Samba stuff.
Brian j Read
(retired, for a second time, still got 2 installations though)
The instrument I am playing is my favourite Melodeon.
.........

Offline Daniel B.

  • *
  • 1,699
  • +0/-0
    • Firewall Services, la sécurité des réseaux
I doubt it - the fix has not been released upstream as far as I can tell.

Can't say for SME8, but on SME9 it seems to be fixed
C'est la fin du monde !!! :lol:

Offline Stefano

  • *
  • 10,839
  • +2/-0
Wiil do some tests asap and report back

Offline Stefano

  • *
  • 10,839
  • +2/-0
here I am..

VM running SME 8.2 with samba3x-3.6.23-9.el5_11.. enabled DC, joined a VM running w2003.. all working as expected..

update SME to the last step, running on samba3x-3.6.23-12.el5_11.. I'm not able to log in anymore

so for SME8.2 the issue is still present

Offline bunkobugsy

  • *
  • 280
  • +4/-0
3.6.23-35 for SME 9.1 fixes this https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0992.html

Offline TerryF

  • grumpy old man
  • *
  • 1,826
  • +6/-0
3.6.23-35 for SME 9.1 fixes this https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0992.html

They slipped that out under the cover of darkness...

Not in rhsa announcements...

Edited: grammer
« Last Edit: May 29, 2016, 03:39:36 AM by TerryF »
--
qui scribit bis legit

Offline pisaacs

  • 15
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.millison.com.au
I am no expert, but the upgrades to 9.1 seem to be working fine for me for my Windows XP and Windows 7 domain logons,
regards Paul