thank you all for your hard work.
Sorry for my weak understandig, but what is confusing me is:
if sme V9 is meant to be perfectly compatible with the V8.1, then i understand this is a bug ( because every contribs of sme8 should be compatible with sme9 => it's not the smeserver-egroupware "fault" ). However, smeserver-egroupware has been designed to work with sme8 ( and i confirm it's working ok for me ), and i report, on the hypothesis to make a smeserver-egroupware compatible with sme9, that apparently, the only part to adapt to sme9, is the aspell part.
The question is: is this a bug from sme9 or is this a request to adapt smeserver-egroupware to sme9.
Kind regards