Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

When is 8.0 to be expected?

Offline MattLittler

  • 6
  • +0/-0
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2008, 11:43:19 PM »
Ignore, I just saw it in the bugzilla...
Doh!
M

Offline cactus

  • *
  • 4,880
  • +3/-0
    • http://www.snetram.nl
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2008, 09:23:54 AM »
Yo Cactus - is this expected when running 'yum update' on my SBME8beta box?  If not, I'll create a bugzilla.  If yes, I'm a dumbass!
cheers
Matt
yum update
==============================================================
WARNING: Additional commands may be required after running yum
==============================================================
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Loading "smeserver" plugin
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
not using ftp, http, or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet
Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: updates
================================================================
No new rpms were installed. No additional commands are required.
================================================================
Might already be in the bugtracker, not sure about that. Are you sure you followed the instructions listed here: http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server_8 ?And I just noticed your other reply after this reply :-)
Be careful whose advice you buy, but be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than its worth ~ Baz Luhrmann - Everybody's Free (To Wear Sunscreen)

Offline MattLittler

  • 6
  • +0/-0
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2008, 09:40:15 PM »
haha.. def. followed instructions, just it's already known.  What about cron telling me this:

Warning: The SSH and rkhunter configuration options should be the same:
         SSH configuration option 'PermitRootLogin': yes
         Rkhunter configuration option 'ALLOW_SSH_ROOT_USER': no
and this:

Warning: The following processes are using deleted files:
         Process: /usr/bin/perl.#prelink#    PID: 4926    File: /usr/bin/perl.#prelink#

I can see a reason for the SSH error (I enabled remote SSH login using server-manager), but I don't have a scooby-doo about the perl error (I know less than nothing about perl).
should I add these to the bugzilla?
cheers
M

Offline CharlieBrady

  • *
  • 6,918
  • +3/-0
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2008, 09:46:25 PM »
should I add these to the bugzilla?

You should search there first, and anything you don't find you should report. Thanks.

Offline mercyh

  • *
  • 824
  • +0/-0
    • http://mercyh.org
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2008, 10:03:28 PM »
Matt,

Quote
Warning: The SSH and rkhunter configuration options should be the same:
         SSH configuration option 'PermitRootLogin': yes
         Rkhunter configuration option 'ALLOW_SSH_ROOT_USER': no

This could be ignored as noise. But if you want to fix it the answer is Here.

http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=39594.0

replies #7 and #9

Offline MattLittler

  • 6
  • +0/-0
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2008, 11:27:43 PM »
Thanks mercy, I've implemented the fix in the thread.  Let's see what tomorrow brings!
cheers
Matt

Offline mercyh

  • *
  • 824
  • +0/-0
    • http://mercyh.org
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2008, 11:40:59 PM »
Quote
Warning: The following processes are using deleted files:

bugzilla shows a workaround for this in 7.3. (Turning off RKHunter's deleted files check) I do not see a bug for it in 8.0. I would suggest you open a bug for it in 8.0 as the Devs may choose to push 8.0 with that check already turned off.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2008, 11:57:10 PM by mercyh »

Offline beast

  • *
  • 245
  • +0/-0
Re: When is 8.0 to be expected?
« Reply #22 on: September 04, 2008, 04:34:21 PM »
Just a note that came to mind when I read this thread.......

In the past I really testet the beta releases etc. Was a bit involved!

The problem come with the bug tracker system that every developer seam to point at (and I understand why from a developer stand point). Every time somebody ask a question or have a problem they are directed to the bug system. The problem is that, in my view, the system is made to be used by the developers and most "ordinary" people is repelled by this system. It does not look nice to use or understand in any way. There is also a problem with the split between the forum that everybody understand and the bug tracker. What is the difference, when shall we use the forum and when shall we use the bug tracker etc. You also need a specific access name and password for each system.

The end result is that the developers do not get so many errors to solve, but the error are more documented and easy to list - but does it make a better system in the end? I do not think so! It is also the reason why people ask for the status of version 8 - nothing about it anywhere else but in the bug tracker really (everything else is outdated). May also be the reason why we still wait for version 8. Nobody like to get involved with the current system.

The solution is to make a better interface for a bug system and hopefully integrate it with a simple forum in some way. I know this is quite a project and out of scope for the SME-server people, but there may be a better system out there somewhere.