Correct me if I m wrong, but looking in the email I got, which I posted in my Reply #7
Device /dev/sda2 is now an active member of md device /dev/md2.
it says that sda2 is now an active ...md2,
so it was not before.
It was (and possibly still is) not. It appears from your previous posts that partition sda2 failed, rebuilt and then failed again. What state it is in now is unknown as you keep referring to old posts.
And when one looks at my Reply#8
md2 : active raid1 sda2[2](F) sdb2[1]
732467520 blocks [2/1] [_U]
md1 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
104320 blocks [2/2] [UU]
these are two identical 750 gig drives, and md1: sda1 shows some strange size.
So am I reading this right? I need to replace sda1 not sda2?
No, and you have been told already that sda1 is NOT a drive, it is a partition.
md1 and md2 are neither drives nor are they partitions, they are mirror devices (aka raid devices)
You appear to be completely confused about drives (actual physical hardware devices), partitions (parts of each physical device) and mirror devices, maybe this will help you:
sda1+sdb1=md1
sda2+sdb2=md2
sda1 (serial drive "A", partition #1) + sdb1 (serial drive "B", partition #1) are mirrored together to form md1 (mirror device #1) This is the small one that contains /boot
sda2 (serial drive "A", partition #2) + sdb2 (serial drive "B", partition #2) are mirrored together to form md2 (mirror device #2) This is the large one that contains everything else.
Or perhaps an illistration (sorry, best I could come up with):
Simple 2 drive raid 1 mirror
Drives Mirrors
sda sdb
P | 1 | + | 1 | = |md1|
a |---|---|---|---|---|
r | | | | | |
t | | | | | |
i | | | | | |
t | | | | | |
i | 2 | + | 2 | = |md2|
o | | | | | |
n | | | | | |
s | | | | | |
So, sda1 and sda2 are on the same drive (sda) and if any partition on a particular drive is bad (sda2 in your case) then you need to replace the entire drive (that would be sda in your case).
Make sense now?